<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Mercedes SLC Gullwing illustration do you like most?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/</link>
	<description>Latest Mercedes-Benz news, reviews and rumors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB fan</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-180464</link>
		<dc:creator>MB fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-180464</guid>
		<description>I really like number 2. It reminds me the old version of 300 SL.
Shapes and whole look of this new design itÂ´s accurate for its successor. I prefer this one. Number 1. looks to me like a potencial future look of SL maybe CLK. Number 3. is in my opinion really aborted connection of two different styles put together and number 4. seems to me like &quot;I donÂ´t know what I want to be&quot;. Number 5. ? ThatÂ´s more likely as new SLR from the next era as SLS is going to be its substitude so far now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like number 2. It reminds me the old version of 300 SL.<br />
Shapes and whole look of this new design itÂ´s accurate for its successor. I prefer this one. Number 1. looks to me like a potencial future look of SL maybe CLK. Number 3. is in my opinion really aborted connection of two different styles put together and number 4. seems to me like &#8220;I donÂ´t know what I want to be&#8221;. Number 5. ? ThatÂ´s more likely as new SLR from the next era as SLS is going to be its substitude so far now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonganie</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-175709</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonganie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-175709</guid>
		<description>I think the Porsche lookalike #2 is de best bt #1 looks more of reality when looking at current Merc cars&amp; #3 is it a joke? I wud hve loved to see more of #5 though_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Porsche lookalike #2 is de best bt #1 looks more of reality when looking at current Merc cars&amp; #3 is it a joke? I wud hve loved to see more of #5 though_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-175607</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-175607</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go with the first one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go with the first one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAUL</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-175388</link>
		<dc:creator>PAUL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-175388</guid>
		<description># 2. CLASSICALLY STYLED, WITH MODERN SHEETMETAL. AN ORIGINAL THAT&#039;S BEEN PUT THROUGH A TIME MACHINE THAT MAKES THINGS OLD, FRESH AND NEW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 2. CLASSICALLY STYLED, WITH MODERN SHEETMETAL. AN ORIGINAL THAT&#8217;S BEEN PUT THROUGH A TIME MACHINE THAT MAKES THINGS OLD, FRESH AND NEW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muamer Hodzic</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-128219</link>
		<dc:creator>Muamer Hodzic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-128219</guid>
		<description>Ah darn it. I totally missed the Autobild illustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah darn it. I totally missed the Autobild illustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorbeam.com</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-128178</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorbeam.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-128178</guid>
		<description>I will go with the Hussein illustration it looks super.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will go with the Hussein illustration it looks super.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.E.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.benzinsider.com/2008/08/which-mercedes-slc-gullwing-illustration-do-you-like-most/comment-page-1/#comment-128176</link>
		<dc:creator>H.E.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benzinsider.com/?p=2438#comment-128176</guid>
		<description>Actually, I choose none of these. AutoBild&#039;s illustration is far better than any of these. (Here is the link: http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/14/autobild-opens-up-on-2010-mercedes-300sl-gullwing/)
Among these I liked #4.#5 need a little more touch. Front end is great but the lines going over the wheels are not so good.
I would absolutely NOT choose #1 or #3. #1 doesn&#039;t contain the traditional Mercedes-Benz lines. #3, no comment about it. Just it looks like a child&#039;s illustration.
That what I&#039;m thinkin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I choose none of these. AutoBild&#8217;s illustration is far better than any of these. (Here is the link: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/14/autobild-opens-up-on-2010-mercedes-300sl-gullwing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/14/autobild-opens-up-on-2010-mercedes-300sl-gullwing/</a>)<br />
Among these I liked #4.#5 need a little more touch. Front end is great but the lines going over the wheels are not so good.<br />
I would absolutely NOT choose #1 or #3. #1 doesn&#8217;t contain the traditional Mercedes-Benz lines. #3, no comment about it. Just it looks like a child&#8217;s illustration.<br />
That what I&#8217;m thinkin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

